George W. Bush:
I believe society is better off by a clear definition of traditional marriage. And the reason I do -- (applause) -- the reason I do is because, one, traditional marriage between man and a woman has served society and civilization well. Secondly, there is a firm commitment required in a marriage between a man and a woman that must not be undermined by redefinition. That commitment, in itself, provides stable, loving environments for families. (Thursday, Aug 5)
Are society and civilization really all that great right now? Is it because of marriage between one man and one woman? Does redefining a commitment (or anything) actually change it? Or just the perception of it, for those who are perhaps questioning their definition in the first place?
It's all about definitions. How I choose to define a situation or event, how you choose to see it. The truth's somewhere in the middle. Or perhaps it's between two individals.
Saturday, August 07, 2004
Stability for Families
Posted by
Kathleen
at
8:15 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(59)
-
▼
August
(34)
- The Best Job in The World
- Mascots
- Hearts and Minds
- Kerry sucks less
- Purple - the new red?
- The national lawn sprinkler
- Oh! the books...
- Blowing the clog away
- Dancers for Sale
- Goodbye Milosz
- Tax Holiday
- Fish have feelings
- Paraskevidekatriaphobia
- Wallace eats the meatloaf
- NUDE olympians!!!!
- Pain of parishoners
- Mike Wallace heads to the slammer
- Family and Friends
- MOCA.
- Stability for Families
- A Home at The End of The World
- Running Against Obama?
- Bushism of the day
- McCain on the nasty politics
- Swiftboat Veterans for Truth
- Chattin' with Dr. Phil
- DONE!
- Poem for Today
- WAY "below the fold" news
- Election Issues
- Stop-over?
- Thought for Today
- Nomar
- Returning from Maine
-
▼
August
(34)
0 comments:
Post a Comment